When tolerance becomes tyranny

Political correctness has led to fear of being ostracised and attacked for offending one of the many "identities"; our binary thinking has created tyranny from the desire for tolerance. Rather than tolerance being "to live and let live", it has become another ideological weapon.

Western thought is binary and our society runs on the misconception that there is absolute right and wrong, good verses evil, etc. The nuanced reality is more honestly framed in eastern thought: we should strive for balance, accept ambiguity and think deeper to arrive at understanding based on tolerance without reverting to ad hominem attacks on those who may have a different view. These differences have been inculcated and are often based on tribal, binary thinking. Deeper thought and engagement with the "other" can resolve differences.

Induced mass migration has created division, anger and hate but when one digs through the layers of deception and misinformation, we discover the Structural Elite agenda at play: to continue the destruction of nation states (as they've done in the Middle East and Balkans) on the march to one world government and the subjugation of humanity.

We can accept diverse culture as enriching while simultaneously fearing the destruction of ourselves, our culture and environment (symbols and ambiance of our own culture). Migration is a question of degrees and purpose. Taking in genuine refugees is a compassionate act born of empathy with fellow humans; welcoming our own destruction by unseen forces is suicide. Induced mass migration is war on us all and the "invaders" are also victims of Structural Elite greed and manipulation.

The Carefully Calculated Mass Migration Agenda by Zen Gardner
This mass migration plan has been in the works for a long time, but they’re kicking it up several serious notches now, flooding the US borders while continuing to swarm European countries with any immigrants they can from a variety of cultures.
What and who is behind it? Clearly staged US/NATO/Israeli sponsored terrorism and genocide are at work in the middle east, driving desperate people to seek asylum elsewhere, as the US mandates inviting in as many as possible over its southern border. And all in concert.

Similarly, issues of gender have been used to create confusion among the young and destroy cohesion within society. Sexual preferences and orientation are driven by many influences but when fashion and culture are subverted by divisive and destructive influences, both the individual and society suffer and fragment.

One question that Camille Paglia didn't address is: what underlies this process? Hierarchy.

The flawed political economy is driving, what seemed in the past to be manageable (if unjust, oppressive and destructive), adverse mechanisms to the point of absurdity. It would be interesting to know whether there is a direct correlation between increased androgyny and concentration of power in the history Camille alludes to.

Young popular culture is being driven by academia and media, which are controlled by the Structural Elite; the societies Camille cites as going through the same degeneration, such as the Weimar Republic, were also being sabotaged by the usual suspects.

"Fashion" and celebrity are manipulating culture into depravity (MK Ultra, Common Purpose etc.) and moral decay. This is not to suggest that we should return to Victorian values, which were equally pernicious (and hypocritical).

Tolerance and understanding of difference is one thing; being trained (and physically augmented) out of one's essential human character into a faux ideal that fashion dictates is destroying humanity.

Microchips will be the next big "fashion" item. "Get your designer integrated iPhone or Google glasses and become superhuman...." - Inversion: "welcome to the sub-human farm."

Shiny stones and notions of illusory wealth are leading humanity to extinction or, worse, to be as beasts of burden for the Structural Elite.

Which brings us to the corruption of thinking through fundamental misconceptions of reality. Natural Inclusion seeks to resolve those misconceptions. This conversation with Alan Rayner seeks to clarify what he means by Natural Inclusion.

Comments   

 
0 #3 Clive Menzies 2017-07-30 19:40
Posted a picture which didn't appear. Trying a link instead http://freecriticalthinking.org/daily-pickings/1983-caving-in-to-illusion
 
 
0 #2 Clive Menzies 2017-07-30 19:39
Quoting James Walter:
"Political correctness has led to fear of being ostracised and attacked for offending one of the many "identities'" to which I and Eleanor Roosevelt respond, "No one can offend you without your permission." which dovetails into Dr Albert Ellis and "Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy" theory. Take a football game. Thousands, perhaps millions, see the exact same game. Yet about half go home happy, about half go home sad, and the rest go home somewhere in between or not bothered at all. Since they all saw the same exact game, it could not be the game that caused their emotions. It was their beliefs and judgements about the game that caused their emotions. Now if someone attacks, threatens, yells at, and so forth, one has an instinctual reaction, not governed by beliefs. One can challenge and replace the thoughts that cause problems and greatly reduce our reactions to various triggers. We are trained from birth to have certain beliefs which cause is to have certain emotions which cause us to behave in certain ways. It is not the other person's behavior.

And so it goes with the extremists of all religions, sects and nationalities. We are not upsetting them!!!! They are upsetting themselves because they believe whatever is horrible - when it clearly is not. By saying we have committed some slight or error, we give them power over us - the power to change us and our society to suit them.

While the individual may not be aware of it, the founders of all religions and nations were/are. The leaders of the radical Muslims, Jew, Hindus, Christians, et. al. want their religion to dominate. This is clearly stated in their texts. It is their leaders who have committed this social crime, trying to impose their religion, and therefore, their leadership over us by claiming we have offended them or their god. Well, if their god is offended, let it step forward and speak. Until then I will regard all such religious sects and nationalisms for what they are: Mind control of their subjects and attempted mind control of everyone else. When they advocate violence to punish those they took offense at, they are terrorists! Pure and Simple. Most of the kings, dictators, popes and other religious leaders were/are terrorists - they are using the threat of violence to change the political landscape!


Well said Jimmy :-)
 
 
0 #1 James Walter 2017-07-30 16:17
"Political correctness has led to fear of being ostracised and attacked for offending one of the many "identities'" to which I and Eleanor Roosevelt respond, "No one can offend you without your permission." which dovetails into Dr Albert Ellis and "Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy" theory. Take a football game. Thousands, perhaps millions, see the exact same game. Yet about half go home happy, about half go home sad, and the rest go home somewhere in between or not bothered at all. Since they all saw the same exact game, it could not be the game that caused their emotions. It was their beliefs and judgements about the game that caused their emotions. Now if someone attacks, threatens, yells at, and so forth, one has an instinctual reaction, not governed by beliefs. One can challenge and replace the thoughts that cause problems and greatly reduce our reactions to various triggers. We are trained from birth to have certain beliefs which cause is to have certain emotions which cause us to behave in certain ways. It is not the other person's behavior.

And so it goes with the extremists of all religions, sects and nationalities. We are not upsetting them!!!! They are upsetting themselves because they believe whatever is horrible - when it clearly is not. By saying we have committed some slight or error, we give them power over us - the power to change us and our society to suit them.

While the individual may not be aware of it, the founders of all religions and nations were/are. The leaders of the radical Muslims, Jew, Hindus, Christians, et. al. want their religion to dominate. This is clearly stated in their texts. It is their leaders who have committed this social crime, trying to impose their religion, and therefore, their leadership over us by claiming we have offended them or their god. Well, if their god is offended, let it step forward and speak. Until then I will regard all such religious sects and nationalisms for what they are: Mind control of their subjects and attempted mind control of everyone else. When they advocate violence to punish those they took offense at, they are terrorists! Pure and Simple. Most of the kings, dictators, popes and other religious leaders were/are terrorists - they are using the threat of violence to change the political landscape!
 

Please register to post comments